1996 BMW 840 vs. 2011 Mazda 3

To start off, 2011 Mazda 3 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 BMW 840. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 BMW 840 would be higher. At 3,982 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 BMW 840 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 BMW 840 (282 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 134 more horse power than 2011 Mazda 3. (148 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 BMW 840 should accelerate faster than 2011 Mazda 3.

Because 1996 BMW 840 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 BMW 840. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 BMW 840 (400 Nm @ 5100 RPM) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Mazda 3. (360 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 1996 BMW 840 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Mazda 3.

Compare all specifications:

1996 BMW 840 2011 Mazda 3
Make BMW Mazda
Model 840 3
Year Released 1996 2011
Body Type Coupe Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3982 cc 2184 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 282 HP 148 HP
Engine RPM 5800 RPM 3500 RPM
Torque 400 Nm 360 Nm
Torque RPM 5100 RPM 1800 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 4790 mm 4590 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1755 mm
Vehicle Height 1350 mm 1471 mm
Wheelbase Size 2690 mm 2639 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 63 L 55 L