1996 BMW M3 vs. 1954 Jeep CJ
To start off, 1996 BMW M3 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 3,246 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 BMW M3 (240 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 181 more horse power than 1954 Jeep CJ. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1954 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 BMW M3 weights approximately 450 kg more than 1954 Jeep CJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1954 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 BMW M3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1954 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 BMW M3 (320 Nm) has 175 more torque (in Nm) than 1954 Jeep CJ. (145 Nm). This means 1996 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1954 Jeep CJ.
Compare all specifications:
1996 BMW M3 | 1954 Jeep CJ | |
Make | BMW | Jeep |
Model | M3 | CJ |
Year Released | 1996 | 1954 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3246 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 240 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 320 Nm | 145 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1030 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2060 mm |