1996 BMW M3 vs. 1958 Triumph TR3
To start off, 1996 BMW M3 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Triumph TR3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Triumph TR3 would be higher. At 3,246 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 BMW M3 (240 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 146 more horse power than 1958 Triumph TR3. (94 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1958 Triumph TR3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 BMW M3 weights approximately 555 kg more than 1958 Triumph TR3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 BMW M3 | 1958 Triumph TR3 | |
Make | BMW | Triumph |
Model | M3 | TR3 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1958 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3246 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 240 HP | 94 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 925 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1400 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2240 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 29 L |