1996 BMW M3 vs. 1964 Citroen 2CV
To start off, 1996 BMW M3 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 3,246 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 BMW M3 (240 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 222 more horse power than 1964 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1964 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 BMW M3 weights approximately 920 kg more than 1964 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1996 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 Citroen 2CV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 BMW M3 | 1964 Citroen 2CV | |
Make | BMW | Citroen |
Model | M3 | 2CV |
Year Released | 1996 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3246 cc | 425 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
Horse Power | 240 HP | 18 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 560 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 63 L |