1996 BMW M3 vs. 1964 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1996 BMW M3 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 3,246 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 BMW M3 (240 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 136 more horse power than 1964 Lotus Elan. (104 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1964 Lotus Elan.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 BMW M3 | 1964 Lotus Elan | |
Make | BMW | Lotus |
Model | M3 | Elan |
Year Released | 1996 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3246 cc | 1558 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 240 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1150 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2140 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 45 L |