1996 BMW M3 vs. 1965 Ford Zodiac

To start off, 1996 BMW M3 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Ford Zodiac. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Ford Zodiac would be higher. At 3,001 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 BMW M3 (326 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 218 more horse power than 1965 Ford Zodiac. (108 HP @ 4750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1965 Ford Zodiac. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 BMW M3 weights approximately 318 kg more than 1965 Ford Zodiac. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 BMW M3 (305 Nm) has 115 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Ford Zodiac. (190 Nm). This means 1996 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Ford Zodiac. 1965 Ford Zodiac has automatic transmission and 1996 BMW M3 has manual transmission. 1996 BMW M3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1965 Ford Zodiac will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1996 BMW M3 1965 Ford Zodiac
Make BMW Ford
Model M3 Zodiac
Year Released 1996 1965
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3001 cc 2553 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 326 HP 108 HP
Engine RPM 4800 RPM 4750 RPM
Torque 305 Nm 190 Nm
Engine Bore Size 86.2 mm 82.6 mm
Engine Stroke Size 85.9 mm 79.5 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.5:1 8.3:1
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1588 kg 1270 kg
Vehicle Length 4440 mm 4650 mm
Vehicle Width 1720 mm 1770 mm
Vehicle Height 1370 mm 1450 mm
Wheelbase Size 2730 mm 2780 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]