1996 BMW M3 vs. 1969 Ford Fairlane
To start off, 1996 BMW M3 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 3,169 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 BMW M3 (328 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 247 more horse power than 1969 Ford Fairlane. (81 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1969 Ford Fairlane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 BMW M3 weights approximately 322 kg more than 1969 Ford Fairlane. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 BMW M3 | 1969 Ford Fairlane | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | M3 | Fairlane |
Year Released | 1996 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3169 cc | 2781 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 328 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1632 kg | 1310 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 5110 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2960 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 40 L |