1996 BMW M3 vs. 1969 Holden Monaro
To start off, 1996 BMW M3 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Holden Monaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Holden Monaro would be higher. At 5,025 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Holden Monaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 BMW M3 (326 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 118 more horse power than 1969 Holden Monaro. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1969 Holden Monaro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 BMW M3 weights approximately 193 kg more than 1969 Holden Monaro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Holden Monaro (411 Nm) has 106 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 BMW M3. (305 Nm). This means 1969 Holden Monaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 BMW M3.
Compare all specifications:
1996 BMW M3 | 1969 Holden Monaro | |
Make | BMW | Holden |
Model | M3 | Monaro |
Year Released | 1996 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3001 cc | 5025 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 326 HP | 208 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 305 Nm | 411 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1588 kg | 1395 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2830 mm |