1996 BMW M3 vs. 1978 Cadillac Brougham
To start off, 1996 BMW M3 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 5,032 cc (8 cylinders), 1978 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 362 kg more than 1996 BMW M3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 BMW M3 | 1978 Cadillac Brougham | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | M3 | Brougham |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1978 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3001 cc | 5032 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 326 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1588 kg | 1950 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 5630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1950 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 3090 mm |
