1996 BMW M3 vs. 1992 Ford Taurus
To start off, 1996 BMW M3 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Taurus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Taurus would be higher. At 3,246 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 BMW M3 (240 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1992 Ford Taurus. (220 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1992 Ford Taurus.
Because 1996 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Ford Taurus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 BMW M3 (320 Nm) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Ford Taurus. (271 Nm). This means 1996 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Ford Taurus.
Compare all specifications:
1996 BMW M3 | 1992 Ford Taurus | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | M3 | Taurus |
Year Released | 1996 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3246 cc | 2986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 240 HP | 220 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 320 Nm | 271 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 9.8:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2700 mm |