1996 BMW M3 vs. 1994 Jaguar XJ6
To start off, 1996 BMW M3 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Jaguar XJ6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Jaguar XJ6 would be higher. At 3,239 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Jaguar XJ6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 BMW M3 (326 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 115 more horse power than 1994 Jaguar XJ6. (211 HP @ 5100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1994 Jaguar XJ6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Jaguar XJ6 weights approximately 189 kg more than 1996 BMW M3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 BMW M3 (305 Nm) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Jaguar XJ6. (301 Nm). This means 1996 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Jaguar XJ6.
Compare all specifications:
1996 BMW M3 | 1994 Jaguar XJ6 | |
Make | BMW | Jaguar |
Model | M3 | XJ6 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3001 cc | 3239 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 326 HP | 211 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Torque | 305 Nm | 301 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 86.2 mm | 91.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85.9 mm | 83 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1588 kg | 1777 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 5030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2880 mm |