1996 BMW M3 vs. 1995 Volkswagen Fusca

To start off, 1996 BMW M3 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Volkswagen Fusca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Volkswagen Fusca would be higher. At 3,246 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 BMW M3 (240 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 188 more horse power than 1995 Volkswagen Fusca. (52 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1995 Volkswagen Fusca. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 BMW M3 weights approximately 660 kg more than 1995 Volkswagen Fusca. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 BMW M3 (320 Nm) has 215 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Volkswagen Fusca. (105 Nm). This means 1996 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Volkswagen Fusca.

Compare all specifications:

1996 BMW M3 1995 Volkswagen Fusca
Make BMW Volkswagen
Model M3 Fusca
Year Released 1996 1995
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3246 cc 1585 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 240 HP 52 HP
Engine RPM 4800 RPM 4200 RPM
Torque 320 Nm 105 Nm
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1480 kg 820 kg
Vehicle Length 4440 mm 4060 mm
Vehicle Width 1720 mm 1550 mm
Vehicle Height 1370 mm 1510 mm
Wheelbase Size 2710 mm 2410 mm