1996 BMW M3 vs. 1997 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 1997 Cadillac DeVille is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 BMW M3 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 BMW M3 (326 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1997 Cadillac DeVille. (271 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1997 Cadillac DeVille. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 117 kg more than 1996 BMW M3.
Because 1996 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 BMW M3 | 1997 Cadillac DeVille | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | M3 | DeVille |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3001 cc | 4600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 326 HP | 271 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1588 kg | 1705 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 5330 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1950 mm |
