1996 BMW M3 vs. 1997 Mercury Villager
To start off, 1997 Mercury Villager is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 BMW M3 would be higher. At 3,246 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 BMW M3 (240 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 1997 Mercury Villager. (149 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1997 Mercury Villager. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Mercury Villager weights approximately 320 kg more than 1996 BMW M3.
Because 1996 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Mercury Villager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 BMW M3 | 1997 Mercury Villager | |
| Make | BMW | Mercury |
| Model | M3 | Villager |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3246 cc | 2960 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 240 HP | 149 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1800 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4950 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2860 mm |
