1996 BMW M3 vs. 1998 Daewoo Arcadia
To start off, 1998 Daewoo Arcadia is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 BMW M3 would be higher. At 3,206 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Daewoo Arcadia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 BMW M3 (328 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 126 more horse power than 1998 Daewoo Arcadia. (202 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1998 Daewoo Arcadia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 BMW M3 weights approximately 42 kg more than 1998 Daewoo Arcadia. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1996 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Daewoo Arcadia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 BMW M3 | 1998 Daewoo Arcadia | |
| Make | BMW | Daewoo |
| Model | M3 | Arcadia |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3169 cc | 3206 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 328 HP | 202 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1632 kg | 1590 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4960 mm |
