1996 BMW M3 vs. 1999 Ford Econoline
To start off, 1999 Ford Econoline is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 BMW M3 would be higher. At 4,604 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 BMW M3 (240 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 1999 Ford Econoline. (212 HP @ 4450 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1999 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Ford Econoline weights approximately 875 kg more than 1996 BMW M3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Ford Econoline (393 Nm) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 BMW M3. (320 Nm). This means 1999 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 BMW M3.
Compare all specifications:
1996 BMW M3 | 1999 Ford Econoline | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | M3 | Econoline |
Year Released | 1996 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3246 cc | 4604 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 240 HP | 212 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4450 RPM |
Torque | 320 Nm | 393 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 2355 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 3510 mm |