1996 BMW M3 vs. 1999 Nissan C 52
To start off, 1999 Nissan C 52 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 BMW M3 would be higher. At 3,496 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Nissan C 52 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 BMW M3 (328 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 176 more horse power than 1999 Nissan C 52. (152 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1999 Nissan C 52. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 BMW M3 weights approximately 366 kg more than 1999 Nissan C 52. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1999 Nissan C 52 (354 Nm) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 BMW M3. (350 Nm). This means 1999 Nissan C 52 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 BMW M3.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 BMW M3 | 1999 Nissan C 52 | |
| Make | BMW | Nissan |
| Model | M3 | C 52 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 3169 cc | 3496 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 328 HP | 152 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 350 Nm | 354 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 1 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1632 kg | 1266 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2830 mm |
