1996 BMW M3 vs. 1999 Renault Zo
To start off, 1999 Renault Zo is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 BMW M3 would be higher. At 3,169 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 BMW M3 (328 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 254 more horse power than 1999 Renault Zo. (74 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1999 Renault Zo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 BMW M3 weights approximately 57 kg more than 1999 Renault Zo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 BMW M3 (350 Nm) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Renault Zo. (260 Nm). This means 1996 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Renault Zo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 BMW M3 | 1999 Renault Zo | |
| Make | BMW | Renault |
| Model | M3 | Zo |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 3169 cc | 1999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 328 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 350 Nm | 260 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1632 kg | 1575 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2580 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 83 L |
