1996 BMW M3 vs. 2000 Fiat Siena
To start off, 2000 Fiat Siena is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 BMW M3 would be higher. At 3,246 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 BMW M3 (240 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 189 more horse power than 2000 Fiat Siena. (51 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2000 Fiat Siena. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 BMW M3 weights approximately 180 kg more than 2000 Fiat Siena. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1996 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Fiat Siena, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 BMW M3 (320 Nm) has 120 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Fiat Siena. (200 Nm). This means 1996 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Fiat Siena.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 BMW M3 | 2000 Fiat Siena | |
| Make | BMW | Fiat |
| Model | M3 | Siena |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3246 cc | 1910 cc |
| Horse Power | 240 HP | 51 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 320 Nm | 200 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1300 kg |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 65 L |
