1996 BMW M3 vs. 2000 Ford Equator
To start off, 2000 Ford Equator is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 BMW M3 would be higher. At 3,169 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 BMW M3 (328 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 200 more horse power than 2000 Ford Equator. (128 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Equator. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 BMW M3 weights approximately 424 kg more than 2000 Ford Equator. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 BMW M3 (350 Nm) has 190 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Equator. (160 Nm). This means 1996 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Equator.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 BMW M3 | 2000 Ford Equator | |
| Make | BMW | Ford |
| Model | M3 | Equator |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3169 cc | 1787 cc |
| Horse Power | 328 HP | 128 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 350 Nm | 160 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1632 kg | 1208 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 3260 mm |
