1996 BMW M3 vs. 2000 Jaguar XKA
To start off, 2000 Jaguar XKA is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 BMW M3 would be higher. At 4,399 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Jaguar XKA is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Jaguar XKA (466 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 140 more horse power than 1996 BMW M3. (326 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Jaguar XKA should accelerate faster than 1996 BMW M3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Jaguar XKA weights approximately 212 kg more than 1996 BMW M3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Jaguar XKA (843 Nm) has 538 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 BMW M3. (305 Nm). This means 2000 Jaguar XKA will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 BMW M3.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 BMW M3 | 2000 Jaguar XKA | |
| Make | BMW | Jaguar |
| Model | M3 | XKA |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3001 cc | 4399 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 326 HP | 466 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6150 RPM |
| Torque | 305 Nm | 843 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1588 kg | 1800 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2590 mm |
