1996 BMW M3 vs. 2001 Daewoo Korando

To start off, 2001 Daewoo Korando is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 BMW M3 would be higher. At 3,199 cc, 2001 Daewoo Korando is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 BMW M3 (328 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 223 more horse power than 2001 Daewoo Korando. (105 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2001 Daewoo Korando. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 BMW M3 weights approximately 544 kg more than 2001 Daewoo Korando. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1996 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Daewoo Korando, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 BMW M3 (350 Nm) has 205 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Daewoo Korando. (145 Nm). This means 1996 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Daewoo Korando.

Compare all specifications: