1996 BMW M3 vs. 2001 Mazda B2500
To start off, 2001 Mazda B2500 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 BMW M3 would be higher. At 3,001 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 BMW M3 (326 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 244 more horse power than 2001 Mazda B2500. (82 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2001 Mazda B2500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mazda B2500 weights approximately 152 kg more than 1996 BMW M3.
Because 2001 Mazda B2500 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 BMW M3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mazda B2500 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 BMW M3 (305 Nm) has 111 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Mazda B2500. (194 Nm). This means 1996 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Mazda B2500.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 BMW M3 | 2001 Mazda B2500 | |
| Make | BMW | Mazda |
| Model | M3 | B2500 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3001 cc | 2497 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 3 valves |
| Horse Power | 326 HP | 82 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 305 Nm | 194 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 3 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1588 kg | 1740 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 5010 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1620 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2990 mm |
