1996 BMW M3 vs. 2003 Holden Statesman
To start off, 2003 Holden Statesman is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 BMW M3 would be higher. At 5,667 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Holden Statesman is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 BMW M3 (328 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 2003 Holden Statesman. (316 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2003 Holden Statesman. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Holden Statesman weights approximately 118 kg more than 1996 BMW M3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Holden Statesman (461 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 111 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 BMW M3. (350 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 2003 Holden Statesman will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 BMW M3.
Compare all specifications:
1996 BMW M3 | 2003 Holden Statesman | |
Make | BMW | Holden |
Model | M3 | Statesman |
Year Released | 1996 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3169 cc | 5667 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 328 HP | 316 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 350 Nm | 461 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1632 kg | 1750 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 5200 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2950 mm |