1996 BMW M3 vs. 2003 Rover City
To start off, 2003 Rover City is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 BMW M3 would be higher. At 3,169 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 BMW M3 (328 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 244 more horse power than 2003 Rover City. (84 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2003 Rover City. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 BMW M3 weights approximately 592 kg more than 2003 Rover City. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1996 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Rover City, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 BMW M3 (350 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 231 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Rover City. (119 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1996 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Rover City.
Compare all specifications:
1996 BMW M3 | 2003 Rover City | |
Make | BMW | Rover |
Model | M3 | City |
Year Released | 1996 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3169 cc | 1405 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 328 HP | 84 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 350 Nm | 119 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86.4 mm | 75.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91 mm | 79.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.3:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1632 kg | 1040 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 37 L |