1996 BMW M3 vs. 2004 Ford E-150
To start off, 2004 Ford E-150 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 BMW M3 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 BMW M3 (326 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 2004 Ford E-150. (225 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford E-150. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-150 weights approximately 539 kg more than 1996 BMW M3.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-150 (388 Nm) has 83 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 BMW M3. (305 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 BMW M3.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 BMW M3 | 2004 Ford E-150 | |
| Make | BMW | Ford |
| Model | M3 | E-150 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3001 cc | 4605 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 326 HP | 225 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 305 Nm | 388 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1588 kg | 2127 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 5390 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 2020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 2060 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 3510 mm |
