1996 BMW M3 vs. 2005 Chrysler Sebring
To start off, 2005 Chrysler Sebring is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 BMW M3 would be higher. At 3,169 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 BMW M3 (328 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 178 more horse power than 2005 Chrysler Sebring. (150 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2005 Chrysler Sebring. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 BMW M3 weights approximately 109 kg more than 2005 Chrysler Sebring. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1996 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chrysler Sebring, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 BMW M3 (350 Nm) has 133 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chrysler Sebring. (217 Nm). This means 1996 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chrysler Sebring.
Compare all specifications:
1996 BMW M3 | 2005 Chrysler Sebring | |
Make | BMW | Chrysler |
Model | M3 | Sebring |
Year Released | 1996 | 2005 |
Body Type | Convertible | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3169 cc | 2425 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 328 HP | 150 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 350 Nm | 217 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.3:1 | 9.4:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1632 kg | 1523 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 61 L |