1996 BMW M3 vs. 2005 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2005 Jaguar XJ is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 BMW M3 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jaguar XJ (390 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 1996 BMW M3. (326 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1996 BMW M3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 146 kg more than 1996 BMW M3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jaguar XJ (541 Nm) has 236 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 BMW M3. (305 Nm). This means 2005 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 BMW M3. 2005 Jaguar XJ has automatic transmission and 1996 BMW M3 has manual transmission. 1996 BMW M3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Jaguar XJ will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1996 BMW M3 | 2005 Jaguar XJ | |
Make | BMW | Jaguar |
Model | M3 | XJ |
Year Released | 1996 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3001 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 326 HP | 390 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6150 RPM |
Torque | 305 Nm | 541 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 86.2 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85.9 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.1:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1588 kg | 1734 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 5100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 3170 mm |