1996 BMW M3 vs. 2005 Mazda Marathon
To start off, 2005 Mazda Marathon is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 BMW M3 would be higher. At 3,001 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 BMW M3 (326 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 222 more horse power than 2005 Mazda Marathon. (104 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2005 Mazda Marathon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 BMW M3 weights approximately 71 kg more than 2005 Mazda Marathon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 BMW M3 (305 Nm) has 131 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mazda Marathon. (174 Nm). This means 1996 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mazda Marathon.
Compare all specifications:
1996 BMW M3 | 2005 Mazda Marathon | |
Make | BMW | Mazda |
Model | M3 | Marathon |
Year Released | 1996 | 2005 |
Engine Size | 3001 cc | 2260 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 326 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 305 Nm | 174 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 86.2 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85.9 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 8.6:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 10 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1588 kg | 1517 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2680 mm |