1996 BMW M3 vs. 2005 Nissan X-Trail

To start off, 2005 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 BMW M3 would be higher. At 3,169 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 BMW M3 (328 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 220 more horse power than 2005 Nissan X-Trail. (108 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2005 Nissan X-Trail. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 128 kg more than 1996 BMW M3.

Because 2005 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 BMW M3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 BMW M3 (350 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Nissan X-Trail. (270 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1996 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Nissan X-Trail.

Compare all specifications:

1996 BMW M3 2005 Nissan X-Trail
Make BMW Nissan
Model M3 X-Trail
Year Released 1996 2005
Body Type Convertible SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3169 cc 2184 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 328 HP 108 HP
Engine RPM 7400 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 350 Nm 270 Nm
Torque RPM 3250 RPM 2000 RPM
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1632 kg 1760 kg
Wheelbase Size 2720 mm 2540 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 63 L 60 L