1996 BMW M3 vs. 2006 Cadillac DTS
To start off, 2006 Cadillac DTS is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 BMW M3 would be higher. At 4,572 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac DTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac DTS (275 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1996 BMW M3. (240 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac DTS should accelerate faster than 1996 BMW M3.
Because 1996 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac DTS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac DTS (396 Nm) has 76 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 BMW M3. (320 Nm). This means 2006 Cadillac DTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 BMW M3.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 BMW M3 | 2006 Cadillac DTS | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | M3 | DTS |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3246 cc | 4572 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 240 HP | 275 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 320 Nm | 396 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 5280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2940 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 68 L |
