1996 BMW M3 vs. 2006 Toyota MR2
To start off, 2006 Toyota MR2 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 BMW M3 would be higher. At 3,001 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 BMW M3 (326 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 186 more horse power than 2006 Toyota MR2. (140 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2006 Toyota MR2.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 BMW M3 (305 Nm) has 74 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Toyota MR2. (231 Nm). This means 1996 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Toyota MR2.
Compare all specifications:
1996 BMW M3 | 2006 Toyota MR2 | |
Make | BMW | Toyota |
Model | M3 | MR2 |
Year Released | 1996 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 3001 cc | 1799 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 326 HP | 140 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 305 Nm | 231 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1250 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2460 mm |