1996 BMW M3 vs. 2006 Volkswagen Citi

To start off, 2006 Volkswagen Citi is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 BMW M3 would be higher. In terms of performance, 1996 BMW M3 (326 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 243 more horse power than 2006 Volkswagen Citi. (83 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2006 Volkswagen Citi. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 BMW M3 weights approximately 731 kg more than 2006 Volkswagen Citi. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1996 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Volkswagen Citi, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 BMW M3 (305 Nm) has 187 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Volkswagen Citi. (118 Nm). This means 1996 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Volkswagen Citi.

Compare all specifications: