1996 BMW M3 vs. 2007 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2007 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 BMW M3 would be higher. At 3,001 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 BMW M3 (326 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 2007 Mazda RX-8. (232 HP @ 8500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2007 Mazda RX-8.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 BMW M3 (305 Nm) has 89 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Mazda RX-8. (216 Nm). This means 1996 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Mazda RX-8.
Compare all specifications:
1996 BMW M3 | 2007 Mazda RX-8 | |
Make | BMW | Mazda |
Model | M3 | RX-8 |
Year Released | 1996 | 2007 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3001 cc | 1308 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 326 HP | 232 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 8500 RPM |
Torque | 305 Nm | 216 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 86.2 mm | 73 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85.9 mm | 85 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2710 mm |