1996 BMW M3 vs. 2008 Chrysler Neon
To start off, 2008 Chrysler Neon is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 BMW M3 would be higher. At 3,246 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 BMW M3 weights approximately 175 kg more than 2008 Chrysler Neon.
Because 1996 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Chrysler Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 BMW M3 (320 Nm) has 142 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Chrysler Neon. (178 Nm). This means 1996 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Chrysler Neon.
Compare all specifications:
1996 BMW M3 | 2008 Chrysler Neon | |
Make | BMW | Chrysler |
Model | M3 | Neon |
Year Released | 1996 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3246 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 240 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 320 Nm | 178 Nm |
Top Speed | 220 km/hour | 183 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1305 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2670 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 47 L |