1996 BMW M3 vs. 2009 Holden Colorado
To start off, 2009 Holden Colorado is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 BMW M3 would be higher. At 3,246 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 BMW M3 (240 HP) has 117 more horse power than 2009 Holden Colorado. (123 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2009 Holden Colorado.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 BMW M3 (320 Nm) has 113 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Holden Colorado. (207 Nm). This means 1996 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Holden Colorado.
Compare all specifications:
1996 BMW M3 | 2009 Holden Colorado | |
Make | BMW | Holden |
Model | M3 | Colorado |
Year Released | 1996 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3246 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 240 HP | 123 HP |
Torque | 320 Nm | 207 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |