1996 BMW M3 vs. 2009 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2009 Holden Cruze is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 BMW M3 would be higher. At 3,001 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 BMW M3 (326 HP) has 187 more horse power than 2009 Holden Cruze. (139 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2009 Holden Cruze.
Because 1996 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Holden Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 BMW M3 (305 Nm) has 129 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Holden Cruze. (176 Nm). This means 1996 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Holden Cruze.
Compare all specifications:
1996 BMW M3 | 2009 Holden Cruze | |
Make | BMW | Holden |
Model | M3 | Cruze |
Year Released | 1996 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3001 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 326 HP | 139 HP |
Torque | 305 Nm | 176 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4597 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1788 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1477 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2685 mm |