1996 BMW M3 vs. 2009 Pagani Zonda
To start off, 2009 Pagani Zonda is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 BMW M3 would be higher. At 7,300 cc (12 cylinders), 2009 Pagani Zonda is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Pagani Zonda (594 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 268 more horse power than 1996 BMW M3. (326 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Pagani Zonda should accelerate faster than 1996 BMW M3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 BMW M3 weights approximately 358 kg more than 2009 Pagani Zonda.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Pagani Zonda (759 Nm) has 454 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 BMW M3. (305 Nm). This means 2009 Pagani Zonda will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 BMW M3.
Compare all specifications:
1996 BMW M3 | 2009 Pagani Zonda | |
Make | BMW | Pagani |
Model | M3 | Zonda |
Year Released | 1996 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 3001 cc | 7300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 326 HP | 594 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6150 RPM |
Torque | 305 Nm | 759 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1588 kg | 1230 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4435 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 2055 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1141 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2730 mm |