1996 BMW M3 vs. 2009 SsangYong Stavic
To start off, 2009 SsangYong Stavic is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 BMW M3 would be higher. At 3,001 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 BMW M3 (326 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 163 more horse power than 2009 SsangYong Stavic. (163 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2009 SsangYong Stavic. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 SsangYong Stavic weights approximately 335 kg more than 1996 BMW M3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 SsangYong Stavic (340 Nm) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 BMW M3. (305 Nm). This means 2009 SsangYong Stavic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 BMW M3. 2009 SsangYong Stavic has automatic transmission and 1996 BMW M3 has manual transmission. 1996 BMW M3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 SsangYong Stavic will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1996 BMW M3 | 2009 SsangYong Stavic | |
Make | BMW | SsangYong |
Model | M3 | Stavic |
Year Released | 1996 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3001 cc | 2696 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 326 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 305 Nm | 340 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 86.2 mm | 86.3 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85.9 mm | 92.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 18.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1588 kg | 1923 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 5130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1920 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 3010 mm |