1996 BMW M3 vs. 2010 Cadillac SRX

To start off, 2010 Cadillac SRX is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 BMW M3 would be higher. At 3,246 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac SRX (265 HP @ 6950 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1996 BMW M3. (240 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac SRX should accelerate faster than 1996 BMW M3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac SRX weights approximately 436 kg more than 1996 BMW M3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1996 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac SRX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 BMW M3 (320 Nm) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Cadillac SRX. (302 Nm). This means 1996 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Cadillac SRX. 2010 Cadillac SRX has automatic transmission and 1996 BMW M3 has manual transmission. 1996 BMW M3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Cadillac SRX will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1996 BMW M3 2010 Cadillac SRX
Make BMW Cadillac
Model M3 SRX
Year Released 1996 2010
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3246 cc 3000 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 240 HP 265 HP
Engine RPM 4800 RPM 6950 RPM
Torque 320 Nm 302 Nm
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1480 kg 1916 kg
Vehicle Length 4440 mm 4834 mm
Vehicle Width 1720 mm 1910 mm
Vehicle Height 1370 mm 1669 mm
Wheelbase Size 2710 mm 2807 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 63 L 79 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]