1996 BMW M3 vs. 2010 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2010 Jaguar XF is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 BMW M3 would be higher. At 3,246 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jaguar XF (271 HP) has 31 more horse power than 1996 BMW M3. (240 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1996 BMW M3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Jaguar XF (600 Nm) has 280 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 BMW M3. (320 Nm). This means 2010 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 BMW M3. 2010 Jaguar XF has automatic transmission and 1996 BMW M3 has manual transmission. 1996 BMW M3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Jaguar XF will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1996 BMW M3 | 2010 Jaguar XF | |
Make | BMW | Jaguar |
Model | M3 | XF |
Year Released | 1996 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3246 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 240 HP | 271 HP |
Torque | 320 Nm | 600 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1877 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1461 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2908 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 70 L |