1996 BMW M3 vs. 2011 Honda Jazz
To start off, 2011 Honda Jazz is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 BMW M3 would be higher. At 3,001 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 BMW M3 (326 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 208 more horse power than 2011 Honda Jazz. (118 HP @ 6600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2011 Honda Jazz.
Because 1996 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Honda Jazz, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 BMW M3 (305 Nm) has 160 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Honda Jazz. (145 Nm). This means 1996 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Honda Jazz.
Compare all specifications:
1996 BMW M3 | 2011 Honda Jazz | |
Make | BMW | Honda |
Model | M3 | Jazz |
Year Released | 1996 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3001 cc | 1497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 326 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6600 RPM |
Torque | 305 Nm | 145 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2510 mm |