1996 BMW M3 vs. 2012 Holden Colorado
To start off, 2012 Holden Colorado is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 BMW M3 would be higher. At 3,001 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 BMW M3 (326 HP) has 165 more horse power than 2012 Holden Colorado. (161 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2012 Holden Colorado.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Colorado (360 Nm) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 BMW M3. (305 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 BMW M3.
Compare all specifications:
1996 BMW M3 | 2012 Holden Colorado | |
Make | BMW | Holden |
Model | M3 | Colorado |
Year Released | 1996 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3001 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 326 HP | 161 HP |
Torque | 305 Nm | 360 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |