1996 BMW Z3 vs. 1952 Holden FX
To start off, 1996 BMW Z3 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,166 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 BMW Z3 (141 HP) has 90 more horse power than 1952 Holden FX. (51 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 BMW Z3 should accelerate faster than 1952 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 BMW Z3 weights approximately 660 kg more than 1952 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 BMW Z3 (180 Nm) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Holden FX. (136 Nm). This means 1996 BMW Z3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Holden FX.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 BMW Z3 | 1952 Holden FX | |
| Make | BMW | Holden |
| Model | Z3 | FX |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1897 cc | 2166 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 141 HP | 51 HP |
| Torque | 180 Nm | 136 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1630 kg | 970 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 4380 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1580 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2620 mm |
