1996 BMW Z3 vs. 1955 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 1996 BMW Z3 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 5,112 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1955 Ford Thunderbird (223 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1996 BMW Z3. (184 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1955 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 1996 BMW Z3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 208 kg more than 1996 BMW Z3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 BMW Z3 | 1955 Ford Thunderbird | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | Z3 | Thunderbird |
Year Released | 1996 | 1955 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2793 cc | 5112 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 184 HP | 223 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1302 kg | 1510 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2600 mm |