1996 BMW Z3 vs. 1960 DKW Munga
To start off, 1996 BMW Z3 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 DKW Munga would be higher. At 2,926 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 BMW Z3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 BMW Z3 (201 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 158 more horse power than 1960 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 BMW Z3 should accelerate faster than 1960 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 BMW Z3 weights approximately 145 kg more than 1960 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1960 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 BMW Z3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1960 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 BMW Z3 | 1960 DKW Munga | |
Make | BMW | DKW |
Model | Z3 | Munga |
Year Released | 1996 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2926 cc | 980 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 201 HP | 43 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3950 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 7.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1255 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 3450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 51 L | 31 L |