1996 BMW Z3 vs. 1963 Seat 600
To start off, 1996 BMW Z3 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Seat 600 would be higher. At 2,926 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 BMW Z3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 BMW Z3 (201 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 177 more horse power than 1963 Seat 600. (24 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 BMW Z3 should accelerate faster than 1963 Seat 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 BMW Z3 weights approximately 680 kg more than 1963 Seat 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 BMW Z3 (275 Nm @ 3950 RPM) has 228 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Seat 600. (47 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1996 BMW Z3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
1996 BMW Z3 | 1963 Seat 600 | |
Make | BMW | Seat |
Model | Z3 | 600 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2926 cc | 767 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 201 HP | 24 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 275 Nm | 47 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3950 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1255 kg | 575 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 3300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1390 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2010 mm |