1996 BMW Z3 vs. 1985 Citroen CX
To start off, 1996 BMW Z3 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Citroen CX would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Citroen CX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 BMW Z3 (141 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1985 Citroen CX. (137 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 BMW Z3 should accelerate faster than 1985 Citroen CX.
Because 1996 BMW Z3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 BMW Z3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Citroen CX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Citroen CX (206 Nm) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 BMW Z3. (180 Nm). This means 1985 Citroen CX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 BMW Z3.
Compare all specifications:
1996 BMW Z3 | 1985 Citroen CX | |
Make | BMW | Citroen |
Model | Z3 | CX |
Year Released | 1996 | 1985 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1897 cc | 2499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 137 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 180 Nm | 206 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 4930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 3100 mm |