1996 BMW Z3 vs. 1997 Ford Falcon
To start off, 1997 Ford Falcon is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 BMW Z3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 BMW Z3 would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Ford Falcon (205 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 1996 BMW Z3. (141 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1996 BMW Z3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 BMW Z3 weights approximately 95 kg more than 1997 Ford Falcon.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Ford Falcon (357 Nm) has 177 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 BMW Z3. (180 Nm). This means 1997 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 BMW Z3.
Compare all specifications:
1996 BMW Z3 | 1997 Ford Falcon | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | Z3 | Falcon |
Year Released | 1996 | 1997 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1897 cc | 3984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 205 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Torque | 180 Nm | 357 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1630 kg | 1535 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2800 mm |