1996 BMW Z3 vs. 1999 Nissan C 52
To start off, 1999 Nissan C 52 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 BMW Z3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 BMW Z3 would be higher. At 3,496 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Nissan C 52 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Nissan C 52 (152 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1996 BMW Z3. (141 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Nissan C 52 should accelerate faster than 1996 BMW Z3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 BMW Z3 weights approximately 364 kg more than 1999 Nissan C 52.
Let's talk about torque, 1999 Nissan C 52 (354 Nm) has 174 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 BMW Z3. (180 Nm). This means 1999 Nissan C 52 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 BMW Z3. 1999 Nissan C 52 has automatic transmission and 1996 BMW Z3 has manual transmission. 1996 BMW Z3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Nissan C 52 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 BMW Z3 | 1999 Nissan C 52 | |
| Make | BMW | Nissan |
| Model | Z3 | C 52 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1897 cc | 3496 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 141 HP | 152 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 180 Nm | 354 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 1 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1630 kg | 1266 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2830 mm |
